Blog Post #2: 'Time' as a key component to 'sustainable principle'.

Because ‘time’ is the key component to ‘sustainable principle’ in Degrowth Ecosocialism it is integral to Eco-capitalism, thus the antithesis of Green Capitalism. In this way, ‘time’ becomes a power law of immediacy, which can be used in new millennial political ecology in a myriad of ways. However, for the thesis of this essay ‘time’ is used as a power law of immediacy to make Climate Change a number one political ideology. Other more specific ways to employ a power law of immediacy might include as a particular ‘sustainable principle’ in Ecosocialism, or perhaps as the regulatory legislative policy in Sustainable Capitalism. The formative use of a power law of immediacy is in-juxtaposition to any regulatory legislative policy that forms after the more fundamental policy is put in place.

To make a more clear distinction to a power law of universality is to understand how a ‘sustainable principle’ can form and be cohesive in putting it to use in one’s life. To recontextualize a power law of diversity, thus multiplicity is to be cohesive [in ‘sustainable principle’] to a power law of universality when put into practice, which then has it as a power law of immediacy juxtaposed to ‘triaging sustainability.’ In other words, if diversity is the natural seat of power to multiplicity, then multiplicity is the natural seat of power for universality. Immediacy is all of this applied in-context to something.

What is fundamental to ‘time’ as a key component to ‘sustainable principle’ is the juxtaposition of the anthropocene, i.e. society, and a planetary time line of the Symbiocene, i.e. the multiverse… One need not make an assumption or draw a conclusion about Climate Change if this fundamental distinction is accounted for, first and foremost. Furthermore, to be accountable for Climate Change, in varying degrees, is to make Climate Change a number one political ideology in New Millennial political ecology. However, in Degrowth Ecosocialism ‘politics is not where life happens…’

Why might Climate science be missing the distinction of ‘time’ in juxtaposition to technology? In my opinion it is because ‘time’ is developmental in the anthropocene within a ‘working’ and ‘non-working’ model of our lives and thus reflected as a teleological directive for autonomy in one’s digital life. On the other hand, ‘time’ is situational in the Symbiocene, just as the Covid-19 pandemic arose from the microcosm and became synonymous with the macrocosm via the adaptation of the planet. To me, this means that this phenomenon is still playing out. And is not different than it was ‘to deny’ Climate Change, which is hardly the case anymore. But, to arrest the exacerbation of Climate Change from triage Sustainability via the effective use of ‘sustainable principles’ is the chief concern of this essay which purports a new theory to Integral Ecology. Degrowth Ecosocialism.